Non-Timber Forest Products-Exchange Programme Philippines (NTFP-EP Ph)
.png)
ICCA 101
Indigenous & Community Conserved Territories and Areas
ICCA = living territory + living governance. Not just a forest, but a whole place (and way of caring) that keeps nature and culture alive.
What is an ICCA?
An ICCA is a clearly defined territory or area—natural or modified—voluntarily conserved by Indigenous Peoples and/or local communities, and governed through customary laws or other effective ways, producing real, long-term outcomes for biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural values.
In the Philippines, ICCAs often sit within Ancestral Domains and may include sacred sites, burial grounds, hunting grounds, water sources/watersheds, and other life-support areas that communities depend on and protect.
What an ICCA is NOT
ICCA is NOT the same as a government-declared Protected Area (PA)
-
Protected Areas are managed through government PA systems and boards (e.g., Protected Area Management Board (PAMB)).
-
ICCAs are governed through Indigenous/Community governance systems (customary institutions / IPS) and customary law.
When these overlap, conflicts can happen, especially when governance systems and zoning concepts clash (e.g., PAMB vs IPS; “sanctuary” vs “strict protection zone”).
ICCA is also NOT “people-free conservation.”
Many ICCAs have zones: some areas are strict protection/sacred, while others allow regulated use under customary rules
The 3 characteristics of ICCAs
Deep community–territory relationship
identity, livelihood, culture, spirituality, survival
Functioning community governance
customary laws + institutions that make and enforce decisions
Real conservation outcomes
nature thrives and community wellbeing is supported
Why ICCAs matter
ICCA, Protected Areas, and OECM : What’s the difference?
-
Protected Area (PA): legally designated conservation area under government frameworks; managed via boards/structures like PAMB.
-
ICCA: conserved and governed by Indigenous Peoples/local communities through customary systems, with proven conservation outcomes.
-
Other Effective Conservation Measure (OECM): an area not officially a protected area but delivering positive, sustained, long-term in-situ biodiversity outcomes (with relevant cultural/spiritual/socio-economic values). Some ICCAs may qualify as OECMs depending on context and recognition pathways.
How ICCAs are documented (community-led, evidence-based)
ICCA documentation is not just “paperwork.” It’s how communities strengthen governance, protect sensitive knowledge, and build evidence for planning and recognition.
The typical process includes:
-
Community research & profiling (history, governance, rules, benefits, threats)
-
Community mapping (boundaries, zones, culturally important sites, hazard areas)
-
Local resource assessment / inventory (state of biodiversity and ecosystem condition)
-
Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practice (IKSP) documentation (knowledge systems & practices linked to governance)
-
Community validation of collected information
-
Community Conservation Planning (CCP) (can align as a chapter of Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and Protection Plan (ADSDPP))
-
Declaration & registration (optional)
Safeguards: FPIC, data governance, and peer review
Voluntary participation is non-negotiable. Communities decide what to share and whether to register. United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) only accepts ICCA information with a community offer + Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC).
For the Global ICCA Registry, the required submission set typically includes:
-
spatial data (often only a central point + total area),
-
questionnaire + case study,
-
FPIC form, and
-
a data contributor agreement.
Peer review exists to check completeness/accuracy and to act as a safeguard (including FPIC and data-collection concerns).
ICCA in practice: Patagonan daw Bahaw-bahaw (AGMIHICU, Bukidnon)
One documented ICCA example is Patagonan daw Bahaw-bahaw, where the community maintains two ICCA types:
Patagonan
core / strict protection
Bahaw-bahaw
buffer / regulated use
sacred/spirit forest areas with strict customary rules (no taking, no disturbance)
hunting/gathering grounds where resource use is allowed under customary governance; supports food, medicine, and livelihoods
In this case, the ICCA spans 10,863.11 hectares total (Patagonan 3,926.61 hectares; Bahaw-bahaw 6,936.50 hectares).
ICCA Stories
ICCA Bill Tracker (Philippines)


We’re tracking the progress of the ICCA Bill in the Philippine House of Representatives under the 20th Congress
Latest milestone
March 2026
Technical Working Group (TWG) Meeting
Continuing deliberations on House Bill No. 01586 (Rep. Maximo Y. Dalog Jr.) and House Bill No. 05761 (Rep. Leila M. de Lima)
Previous milestones
November 2025
December 2025
Committee Organizational Meeting
1st TWG Meeting
Why this matters:
The bill aims to strengthen recognition of Indigenous and community-conserved territories and areas: rights-based conservation that supports both biodiversity and self-determination.
Last updated: 25 February 2026 (based on latest meeting notice).
How you can support ICCAs and Indigenous Peoples (simple actions)
-
Read & share this ICCA 101 hub (help stop misinformation).
-
Follow NTFP-EP Philippines for ICCA updates and community stories.
-
Sign up for ICCA updates / learning sessions.
-
Support rights-based conservation: recognition that strengthens community governance, not replaces it.
Share this hub page:


